That's fair enough and I do agree with you on this, there probably isn't any meaning on the text, but the argument was he doesn't base it on nothing - he looked up the text, found out what it meant, and saw that it could potentially fit the storyline. It may be wrong, but it's not based on nothing - I have a lot of Theories that have been proven wrong, but they where all based on something. It's just that I interpetted the "somethings" wrong.
And I do see a lot of solid evidence with FE's theories (again that doesn't mean they're correct, but I can see where he gets them from.)
What staggers me though, is that you knew who I was talking about!![]()




Reply With Quote