• Final Fantasy Sexism Part I: Why It Matters



    The accuracy of the common mantra “sex sells” is apparent in all forms of media: from movies and TV shows to magazines to video games. Sexy, scantily clad female characters in video games are widely celebrated, from Lara Croft to, well, the entire Dead or Alive cast. If you were to ask gamers who the most well-known Final Fantasy woman was, the buxom Tifa Lockhart would undoubtedly be a popular response. But these characters have also received criticism for their appearance.


    Commonly, a female character’s outfit or pose is not out of any practical reason such as protection, comfort, or ease of movement, but to arouse the viewer. If video games were to be believed, skin-tight and revealing clothing is the most comfortable and practical clothing available for all circumstances, and that bending over sexily is the most natural position for a woman to be in. But if the male characters tried to similarly show themselves off, the results would be patently silly. Why is this any more tolerable coming from women?


    If the men posed like the women in comics. "HULK GROPE!"

    A common response to these points is that the game developers are simply giving the audience what they want, and that men enjoy looking at women. And there’s nothing wrong with that, by itself. But the sexist portrayal of women goes deeper than that. It’s not just the aesthetics by themselves, but the entire way women are portrayed in video games, from their appearance to their personality to their role in the story, that is sexist. The biggest problem being that this is not just in video games; this attitude towards women is indicative of a real-world sexism that pervades our entire culture.

    I want to highlight two other types of sexism to you that are readily apparent in video games, and the Final Fantasy series in particular: the overwhelming use of stereotypical gender roles for female characters, and the common dependence that female characters have on more central, male characters to their relevance in the game.

    As far as gender roles go, there are a handful of molds that Square-Enix has used for many of its female main characters. Women are typically seen as weaker and more nurturing than men. Is it any surprise then that women tend to be the physically weak healers and magic users in the games? The characters’ personalities are also commonly cookie-cutter: the demanding princess, the whiny brat, the damsel in distress, the passionate love interest.


    The dependence on male characters is a more subtle sign of sexism, but equally important and just as pervasive. The Bechdel Test for measuring sexism in movies requires that there be two named women in the movie who talk to each other about something other than a man. A shocking number of movies do not pass this simple test, because too many women are either token female characters or their roles are almost entirely dependent on a more primary male character (such as the typical love interest).

    Why do these matter? Because these types of sexism still exist in the real world. While society has improved a lot, women are still commonly viewed only as family-oriented nurturers who should prioritize having a family and raising children. Women are still underrepresented in many of the most respected professions such as doctors and scientists, and are culturally discouraged from putting forth the effort of seeking them. If you have any doubt that this is still a serious issue, just read this embarrassingly bad article about how women shouldn’t “compete” with men. Female representations in video games may be a pretty small issue regarding sexism in the scheme of things, but the larger issues cannot be combated until we recognize how sexism is guiding our culture.

    To see how our cultural views of women pervade our entertainment, just think: how many stereotypically feminine male video game characters can you think of? It is generally acceptable in modern times for women to act stereotypically “masculine” and be strong fighters, but how many lead characters are feminine men? In this same vein, it is generally accepted in real life for women to be “masculine” and do male things, but it is still commonly taboo for men to act “feminine.” Only what is considered for men is an acceptable goal for everyone.


    In the next part of this series, I will start going through the Final Fantasy games and highlighting some examples of sexism. Final Fantasy is certainly not immune from the types of sexism I outlined above, and some of the games in the Playstation 1 and 2 era were particularly bad examples of sexist portrayals of women. But not all of the games were bad, and I think some Final Fantasy games even deserve praise for their treatment of women characters.

    Before I get into the specific games, I will close with a brief disclaimer. I am a Final Fantasy fan, and I enjoyed playing many of these games, even ones which are some of the worst offenders when it comes to blatant sexism. This article series is not about gameplay or plot or how fun a game is, but exclusively about how women have been portrayed among the playable characters throughout the main Final Fantasy series.

    So what were the worst examples of sexism in Final Fantasy? Is the series now better or worse? Is sexism in video games even a problem? My overview of the Final Fantasy series will begin in two weeks, but feel free to discuss your thoughts in the meantime.


    Other parts in this series:

    Part I
    Part II
    Part III
    Part IV
    Part V
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Final Fantasy Sexism Part I: Why It Matters started by Raistlin View original post
    Comments 76 Comments
    1. Quindiana Jones's Avatar
      Quindiana Jones -
      Imagine being able to make Vaan put on a jumper. That would improve XII so much.
    1. Formalhaut's Avatar
      Formalhaut -
      Quote Originally Posted by Quinter Wonderland View Post
      Imagine being able to make Vaan put on a jumper. That would improve XII so much.


      You mean those HIDEOUS Abdominals. What grave error did XII developers do?
    1. maybee's Avatar
      maybee -
      One of the issues with the Damsel in Distress trope isn't that it's only confined to the obvious stuff where your Player Character's helpless girlfriend has been kidnapped by Satan and will be gratuitously raped every time you have to restart a level. Yes, those games represent a problem.
      Huuuuh ? What game is this ? Huh ?

      Ghosts n Goblins the R 18 version ?

      i don't get this part of the article.... no game is like this.

      Like Aeris, she faces the threat of rape at Don's Mansion
      This scene is optional and what about Cloud ? Cloud can be picked by the Don as well.

      So while Cloud is a male character threatened with rape, he is only threatened with rape when he pretends to be a female character. Which makes the incident difficult to classify.


      He's still threatened with rape. Cross-dressing or not. The man had " Ants in his pants and he was looking for some romance ".


      Shera then submitted to an abusive relationship with Cid out of guilt for "ruining" his dreams.
      Breakdown: Victim of an Abusive Relationship (with a Playable Character!).
      Okay. There is a huge difference between holding a grudge and a abusive relationship. Cid never hit, smacked or slapped or even mentally abused her. He was just really frustrated with her; and judging how he gave up his own dreams to save her life, I doubt that he ever would harm Shera.

      I do have to admit that their relationship does make me feel uncomfortable though.
    1. NeoCracker's Avatar
      NeoCracker -
      ...You know, I'm rather confident Raistlin here can write a better article then that.
    1. Dr. rydrum2112's Avatar
      Dr. rydrum2112 -
      As a scientist- can people stop using gender like it means sex?

      You have to define something before you argue about it,if you are using words but defining them differently than you'll be debating past each other. If someone says "I am using WORD-A to mean X." Then you saying, but it really means Y is useless, it doesn't address whatever point they were making.

      For instance earlier in the thread someone defined bullying sort of narrowly (to exclude death threats etc). And instead of address the point, someone else quoted the "true" definition of bullying. All that does is require the first person to go back and use a different word.

      I think "sexism" needs to be operationally defined (and agreed upon) before you can debate about it.
    1. Del Murder's Avatar
      Del Murder -
      Arguments of semantics usually bring things to a screeching halt, though. Can't spend all day defining every term you use because then you end up in the 'depends on what your definition of "is" is' situation.
    1. chionos's Avatar
      chionos -
      Quote Originally Posted by Del Murder View Post
      Arguments of semantics usually bring things to a screeching halt, though. Can't spend all day defining every term you use because then you end up in the 'depends on what your definition of "is" is' situation.
      Even though I'm a wordophile, and agree in principle with what rydrum is saying, I have to agree with the gangsta here. In large part because a word's denotation is only the start of what a word really means, and the larger part of the meaning is often very relative. Thus, operationally defining something to the agreement of both sides of an argument is impossible. At least in contexts like this one.

      In fact, a large portion of what Raist is doing here (or will be doing) [is] defining sexism (its connotation), by discussing it in a particular context. Our operational definitions develop through conversations and arguments that we have, not by fruitlessly arguing definitions before we even begin.


      It's roots deep.
    1. Dr. rydrum2112's Avatar
      Dr. rydrum2112 -
      Quote Originally Posted by chionos View Post
      Quote Originally Posted by Del Murder View Post
      Arguments of semantics usually bring things to a screeching halt, though. Can't spend all day defining every term you use because then you end up in the 'depends on what your definition of "is" is' situation.
      Even though I'm a wordophile, and agree in principle with what rydrum is saying, I have to agree with the gangsta here. In large part because a word's denotation is only the start of what a word really means, and the larger part of the meaning is often very relative. Thus, operationally defining something to the agreement of both sides of an argument is impossible. At least in contexts like this one.

      In fact, a large portion of what Raist is doing here (or will be doing) [is] defining sexism (its connotation), by discussing it in a particular context. Our operational definitions develop through conversations and arguments that we have, not by fruitlessly arguing definitions before we even begin.
      You and Del missed the point of what I was saying. You have to accept how other people are using it/operationally defining it. This is what is mean by "agreeing".

      You don't have to truly decide on its absolute definition. If one person says- sexism as defined by ____ is not present in game A. Then arguing how that is the wrong definition of sexism is different then arguing if it exists in the game.

      Every time you make a claim about something, you have to provide evidence to support it- and in order to do so you have to operationally define what it is. That isn't decided as you go along, through conversations. Read any quality peer reviewed journal article. What the authors do is define exactly what they mean. This idea that both sides have to definitively agree was not made by me.
    1. Del Murder's Avatar
      Del Murder -
      So did you not like the article then?
    1. Dr. rydrum2112's Avatar
      Dr. rydrum2112 -
      Quote Originally Posted by Del Murder View Post
      So did you not like the article then?
      No, I think Raistlin had the right idea:
      I want to highlight two other types of sexism to you that are readily apparent in video games, and the Final Fantasy series in particular: the overwhelming use of stereotypical gender roles for female characters, and the common dependence that female characters have on more central, male characters to their relevance in the game.
      It sounds like he is going to highlight and "define" sexism as typical gender roles & male dependence.
    1. Raistlin's Avatar
      Raistlin -
      I'm generally a big definitions guy, and think that many disagreements on some controversial issues are fairly useless without defining the terms -- especially those that provoke an emotional reaction and have a heavily negative connotation. But I did not really want to wade into a debate about the definition of "sexism," so instead focused on certain applications of that term that I felt would be widely accepted -- that not only treat women differently, but place women as subservient to men, or at least drastically limit the variation of personalities and roles as compared to men. Even if you limit the definition of "sexism" to only include that which discriminates against one sex, then everything in my article should fit. In hindsight, perhaps that's something I should have mentioned in the intro.
    1. Gu-fu-fu's Avatar
      Gu-fu-fu -
      As a newb I was pretty scared to read this thread, cause yeah, I be feminist, I went to school for Gender Studies, what? I am also a woman who loves gaming. So yeah, this is super interesting to me.

      So far, so good I think. I am excited for the articles, and discussion. My only comment is that by my understanding the Bechdel Test is for determining sexism in an industry mainly, not a movie or game. It shows whether the game can even remotely be considered women centered, and points out how women's stories are not told as often as men's typically are. A game or movie can fail the Bechdel Test and still not be sexist in my opinion.

      Anyway, I gotta say, I am a big Anita Sarkeesian fan. And she has been doing her pop culture critiques for a while now, so I am fairly sure that she will keep making videos. And yeah, how dare she talk about how guys harassed and threatened her, women are supposed to keep their mouths shut, right?

      If this all makes you hate me now, I will be sad.
    1. Freya's Avatar
      Freya -
      I don't hate the woman, I just don't like how she went about it is all.
    1. Raistlin's Avatar
      Raistlin -
      Quote Originally Posted by Gu-fu-fu View Post
      A game or movie can fail the Bechdel Test and still not be sexist in my opinion.
      I agree with this. It's one factor to consider among others, and as you said is most useful in looking at trends across an entire industry. I only mentioned it as it is somewhat related to a broader application of sexism that I introduced and will be using to analyze the Final Fantasy series: the frequent dependence of female characters on male characters for relevance.
    1. Dr. rydrum2112's Avatar
      Dr. rydrum2112 -
      Quote Originally Posted by Raistlin View Post
      Quote Originally Posted by Gu-fu-fu View Post
      A game or movie can fail the Bechdel Test and still not be sexist in my opinion.
      I agree with this. It's one factor to consider among others, and as you said is most useful in looking at trends across an entire industry. I only mentioned it as it is somewhat related to a broader application of sexism that I introduced and will be using to analyze the Final Fantasy series: the frequent dependence of female characters on male characters for relevance.
      how come no one has come up with a more universal test (other than the "gut" test)?
    1. Raistlin's Avatar
      Raistlin -
      Probably because the woman who created the Bechdel Test is too busy gossiping and getting her nails done to come up with a new one.

      (SPOILER)See what I did there?
  • EoFF on Twitter

  • Square Enix on Twitter